Jump to content

Jeanneau 925 Walkaround


Mike Fox
 Share

Recommended Posts

I popped into Southern Motorboats for a chat with Tom on Thursday, and he was expecting a boat to be delivered back from Weymouth. We strolled round to fuel jetty to have a look.

 

I hadn't seen one quite like this before: 31 foot long, stunning blue hull, with a central console and tan-coloured bimini. Down below there were several berths, a small galley and separate loo, providing good weekending creature comforts. Power supplied by twin 250 HP outboards. I thought "overgrown dory" when I first saw it, but that didn't do it justice, as it was dripping with teak, and was beautifully fitted out.

 

It had to be moved to it's berth at Salterns, so Tom asked if I'd like to join him in a quick spin. Tom grabbed a couple of lifejackets and his trusty grab bag, and we cast off, trundling gently out of the marina.

 

Tom found a straight bit of the channel, yelled "Hang on!" and then wound it up. Over 40 knots in 100m or so, with absolute control and power, and about 25% in reserve. A couple of high speed turns in the main channel, and my eyes were watering with the wind coming over the short screen. Had to take my glasses off to see again! I declined the offer of a "go" and Tom popped it back into the marina, berthing this perfectly with absolute control in tickover ahead/astern.

 

What a blast!

 

I'd never been on anything quite like it. Awesome power, a superb fishing platform (it it had less teak to ruin), and the capability to go pretty well anywhere in some pretty lumpy conditions.

 

Would I like one? Would I enjoy getting to France in 2 hours instead of 10? Would I like to pay the fuel bills on something that could drink 2 litres per hour? I do over 1,000 miles per year - at an average of around 5 knots - so, let's see - 200 hours of travelling time at 30 knots instead would give me 6,000 miles instead ....ermmm that's

Edited by Mike Fox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"and my eyes were watering with the wind coming over the short screen"

 

Thats nothing to the eye-watering that happens when you ask the price ohmy.gif

 

Sorry Tom - still excellent value of course!

Edited by AHoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Would I like to pay the fuel bills on something that could drink 2 litres per hour?"

 

 

ooooh yes please! rolleyes.gif

 

however I estimate that wide open this puppy would be drinking around 180 litres an hour. sick.gif

 

this is not of course to suggest that it couldn't be considered economical - even Phaeton can be pursuaded to swallow 46 lph WOT; but I only use that when there's a danger the bar will be closed whan we get there... weep.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Would I like to pay the fuel bills on something that could drink 2 litres per hour?"

 

 

ooooh yes please! rolleyes.gif

 

however I estimate that wide open this puppy would be drinking around 180 litres an hour. sick.gif

 

this is not of course to suggest that it couldn't be considered economical - even Phaeton can be pursuaded to swallow 46 lph WOT; but I only use that when there's a danger the bar will be closed whan we get there... weep.gif

Just for the record.... WOT will be 160 per hour, but at a more sedate cruising speed you'll be closer to 70 per hour at somewhat over 30 knots....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Would I like to pay the fuel bills on something that could drink 2 litres per hour?"

 

 

ooooh yes please!    rolleyes.gif

 

however I estimate that wide open this puppy would be drinking around 180 litres an hour.  sick.gif

 

this is not of course to suggest that it couldn't be considered economical - even Phaeton can be pursuaded to swallow 46 lph WOT; but I only use that when there's a danger the bar will be closed whan we get there... weep.gif

Just for the record.... WOT will be 160 per hour, but at a more sedate cruising speed you'll be closer to 70 per hour at somewhat over 30 knots....

wow - that (WOT) represents a 42% improvement on the 'old' fuel injected or carbed 2 stoke consumption from only 10 years ago. I knew things were moving on and they had gone through 25 past 30 but that's excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow - that (WOT) represents a 42% improvement on the 'old' fuel injected or carbed 2 stoke consumption from only 10 years ago. I knew things were moving on and they had gone through 25 past 30 but that's excellent.

tongue.giftongue.giftongue.gif

70 litres per hour..... Cheap as chips!

 

...Only

Edited by TomBettle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...