Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The oil rig has now come to the attention of the media this morning,

what I don’t understand is one minute we hear about a marine conservation area

around here then a oil rig turns up to explore the site.

They say they were only test bore holes but why allow them to do this if you were not allowing them to extract the oil.

It was also mentioned B.P found deposits before there?

Posted

Anyone know what the exclusion zone is? Understandably there are mixed feelings but its pretty close to some popular marks so Feb is not a bad month to choose as long as there are no long term effects.

 

riginbay2.jpg

Posted

If you type in google search ENSCO 72 a link to the marinetraffic.com will appear, on there you can view the track marks where the rig is slowly moving around the area.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The problem is they quoted 6700 tons of chemicals initially. It’ll be at least double that now. So that’s 16 tons of biocide. It’s for bacterial control, but who knows what else it’ll affect?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...