Jump to content

Broadband Radar


Gas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi! All

 

 

Just a thought as I am not in the financial position to buy one at the moment weep.gif but the fog thing scares the S**t out of me ohmy.gif and the information I can find looks good, the Navico/ Lowrance video on You Tube looks like an excellent bit of kit also the articles that I have read seam to say the same.

 

What do other club members think of the new Broadband Radar and who has the best price on these units?

 

Nigel I think has one on the way lucky bugger? wink.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the new Raymarine HD radar with class B AIS transponder but it's not yet fitted to the boat so can't comment on how good it is however I did a lot of research and couldn't find much between all the top manufacturers. Furuno came out about the best but does cost a lot of money not that any of them are cheap.

 

A site called panbo http://www.panbo.com has reports and tests on just about everything electrical but look out you might come away confused.I did laugh.gif

 

Martin

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the new Raymarine HD radar with class B AIS transponder but it's not yet fitted to the boat so can't comment on how good it is however I did a lot of research and couldn't find much between all the top manufacturers. Furuno came out about the best but does cost a lot of money not that any of them are cheap.

 

A site called panbo http://www.panbo.com has reports and tests on just about everything electrical but look out you might come away confused.I did laugh.gif

 

Martin

it used to be simple - because there were no colours or pixels! Power and beamwidth were key (more and less respectively being good)

 

pixels actually made it easier to compare and to understand how much power and how small a beamwidth it was worth paying for to match your chosen screen - until the concept of non-dedicated screens and the ability to upgrade components!

 

I actually have the 'worst' resolution LCD screen ever produced with radar, but a slightly better raydome. It works (AWOL knows that!) and I wouldn't be without it in any reduced visibility situation (or on a yacht when crossing busy shipping lanes). Having looked at a number of the newer ones (in use) I have to say they are way, way better in terms of auto settings and overall clarity.

 

Look forward to hearing how others get on with theirs in due course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On foxy fisher too i have navman hd digital radar now named northstar and very happy with it and seems to be better to read when i put it on overlay on the plotter screen but i should use it more in good weather to get more familiar with what i am looking at so when the bad weather comes i can be hopefuly on the ball

 

graham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats the power consumption like on the new units? As we do an awful lot of our boating at night in the harbour I was thinking it would add an extra layer of safety in avoiding any errant mooring buoys. Having tied up to one of the new Barrel Buoys over near Brownsea I certainly would NOT like to hit one of them at any speed. They really are solid and very very heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats the power consumption like on the new units? As we do an awful lot of our boating at night in the harbour I was thinking it would add an extra layer of safety in avoiding any errant mooring buoys. Having tied up to one of the new Barrel Buoys over near Brownsea I certainly would NOT like to hit one of them at any speed. They really are solid and very very heavy.

you wouldn't want to run it without the engine charging!

 

but most of us will have more charging than our electronics/nav lights consume

 

the only time I find it an issue is when drift fishing in fog where I would prefer to turn of the engine (which also means I can hear - in Alderney this means the chat on the other boats before you see them!). Here it would be good to leave it running but hard on the batteries!

 

Whilst the head units get more efficient you still need most of the power to drive the raydome (although most of the head unit efficiency gets consumed by the bigger and bigger screens being used!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that you have all researched this but my understanding of bb radar was that it used about a 10th the power of a conventional radome. The power usage of an LCD screen is negligable.

 

For comparison on my yacht we have a 220 ah battery bank and are very happy to use radar with a conventional radome plus LCD screen for long periods with no appreciable battery drain.

 

I am looking at bb radar for the fishing boat on the understanding that we'll get better target detection and much lower power consumption. We have 150 ah on Hilda Maud.

 

Have I got this right or am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BB lowrance. Standby 1.6w...only 100ma

17w when in use@ 13.8vDc

 

Older units I believe are either 2kw or 4kw

lol rolleyes.gif

 

I haven't seen many radar units wired with the AWG 2/4 cable necessary for 2Kw (that's thicker than many starter circuits)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that you have all researched this but my understanding of bb radar was that it used about a 10th the power of a conventional radome. The power usage of an LCD screen is negligable.

 

For comparison on my yacht we have a 220 ah battery bank and are very happy to use radar with a conventional radome plus LCD screen for long periods with no appreciable battery drain.

 

I am looking at bb radar for the fishing boat on the understanding that we'll get better target detection and much lower power consumption. We have 150 ah on Hilda Maud.

 

Have I got this right or am I missing something?

Chris, the two technologies are so far apart that I really don't see how such comparisons are meaningful.

 

The power consumption characteristics are a bit mis-leading - one of the key advantages is that digital radar doesn't have a Magnetron so can be powered up instantly. This is very useful in good vis if you want to check CPA of something. The other thing is that Magnetron in a small RADAR doesn't use that much of the total power consumed. The array will use a fair bit and the processing will probably use the most but the two technologies are totally different. Digital is normally more efficient but pulse is better at longer ranges.

 

They (the digital units) will use less power overall - but it's not a factor of 10. I don't have the manual for my old JRC to hand but even at 40-50w I consider that a big drain on a small boats batteries; but insignificant relative to a powered craft with engine running.

 

FWIW I have 300Ah total - but only 170x60%=100 free for electronics etc. As this includes the beer fridge it's guarded carefully! ph34r.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can get a bit more complicated, I am afraid.

 

A digital unit eg Garmin, uses a normal 2 or 4 kW pulse head unit, but the signal is processed digitally to give clearer results, often making automatic some functions which would be difficult adjustments otherwise.

 

A broadband unit uses a totally different way of transmitting the pulse, chirping the signal, which gives lower range but much better close-in performance. negating the close-in blank spot of normal pulse radar (which digital units also have).

 

The perfect situation is to have a digital pulse radar for long range and a broadband for short range.

 

Lowrance had to change their advertising last year to avoid making wrongful claims on performance, now only recommending their's for shorter range.

 

john

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Niggle was indicating, according to the spec sheet for the Lowrance BR24 radar it uses a total of 19 Watts operating and 2W in standby ( 150 mA ).

 

The scanner itself has a power output of 0.026 watts !!

 

From a Lowrance presentation :

 

Power Requirements

Power consumption transmitting is only 17 W

30% less than a 2 kW radar

50% less than a 4 kW radar

Power consumption in standby is only 1.6 W

 

Presentation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duncan, thanks for your comments. I guess the major difference between the usage on yacht v a fishing boat is that we only ever use the radar in active mode rather than standby is in thick fog and then we are motoring, so no drain on batts. I'm not sure I've got the nerve to continue drift fishing anywhere near big ships in a pea souper ph34r.gif

 

Any roads up it looks as though the overall power consumption is less (thanks all for the more detailed comparisons) and close range target spotting better so, other than the cost, it looks like a no-brainer.

 

On another point who uses their radar for looking out more than 6-12 miles? The only time we use a range greater than this is when on offshore passages, in the channel we rarely go above 6 miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

completely agree Chris - cost aside BB radar is a no-brainer for our type of use.

 

btw I wasn't advocating drift fishing in fog amongst the shipping lanes (although 2 of us did wreck hop back across the channel one year starting in very poor vis but not in the main lanes!). We have had 20ft vis on the Schole more than once, and radar was great at navigating back up the drifts amongst the 20 or so boats present in the area! For some reason everyone was fishing the shallower areas rolleyes.gif generally avoided by all transiting craft!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just realised that my Lowrance 7200c will accept radar huh.gif reading on t'internet it would seem that it is not Broadband blink.gif whatever that means??

 

Does anyone have any info on this? What do i buy and what will i get? or do i need to go broadband?

Lowrance do both HD and Broadband Radar - and have detailed explanations on their website of the two.

 

From memory the 7200C is a Global Map unit that uses NMEA 2000 networking protocols. It should be compatible with the Lowrance LRA-1800 - HD Radar and might be compatible with their BB radar (it gets a little confusing)

 

Whether you will need a networking hub or can connect the radome direct to the head unit will depend on what you have plugged in at the moment - ie the raydome acts as a powered network device in the same way that your GPS antennae currently does. You may need a red to blue connector or vice versa as well. Can't remember which is which.

 

I really haven't kept up with all this over the last few years so might be way off line.

 

What I have found is that emailing Lowrance support in the US with your question used to be a good route to clear answers.

 

The 7200C is now discontinued and replaced with the HDS head units - but I think they retain the networking even if the plugs have changed (again!!!)

 

Hope this helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...