The Quay is not part of the harbour .....
Tomo
http://www.sembcorpbw.co.uk/net-control/us...arbour_2012.pdf
If you read the darkest depths of the Magna Carta ? Any tidal water is classed as part of the sea !
Christchurch Harbour, is tidal as far as Iford Bridge !
Which begs the question, what legal right do SEMBCORP and RDAA have to impose charges for fishing in tidal waters ?
Especially below the emergence of the river Avon at Clay Pool.
As far as I am aware this has never been challenged in any court.
Comments in due course please,
Dave
I think that if you check you will find that the harbour was sold by the Crown... along with all its rights..... so the crown does not own the foreshore......There are only two river estuaries in the country that this applies to ....the other I believe is the River Beaulieu where Henry V111 had a number of his warships built... and again it was sold as being originally owned by the monks.....so you have no rights to access the foreshore between low water which is not the case with the rest of the country's tidal foreshore........
Not a lot of people know that.......so don't waste your hard earned challenging it
Tomo
The Crown and the Monks never owned it in the first place, they stole it or just put their names to it.
I stand to be corrected but as far as I am aware the reference point is Hgh Water ?
All that aside, do the same rules apply to fishing from a boat ? and are they enforceable ?
D